Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Int J Nanomedicine ; 18: 353-367, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2232746

ABSTRACT

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variants have risen to dominance, which contains far more mutations in the spike protein in comparison to previously reported variants, compromising the efficacy of most existing vaccines or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Nanobody screened from high-throughput naïve libraries is a potential candidate for developing preventive and therapeutic antibodies. Methods: Four nanobodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type receptor-binding domain (RBD) were screened from a naïve phage display library. Their affinity and neutralizing activity were evaluated by surface plasmon resonance assays, surrogate virus neutralization tests, and pseudovirus neutralization assays. Preliminary identification of the binding epitopes of nanobodies by peptide-based ELISA and competition assay. Then four multivalent nanobodies were engineered by attaching the monovalent nanobodies to an antibody-binding nanoplatform constructed based on the lumazine synthase protein cage nanoparticles isolated from the Aquifex aeolicus (AaLS). Finally, the differences in potency between the monovalent and multivalent nanobodies were compared using the same methods. Results: Three of the four specific nanobodies could maintain substantial inhibitory activity against the Omicron (B.1.1.529), of them, B-B2 had the best neutralizing activity against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) pseudovirus (IC50 = 1.658 µg/mL). The antiviral ability of multivalent nanobody LS-B-B2 was improved in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) pseudovirus assays (IC50 = 0.653 µg/mL). The results of peptide-based ELISA indicated that LS-B-B2 might react with the linear epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD conserved regions, which would clarify the mechanisms for the maintenance of potent neutralization of Omicron (B.1.1.529) preliminary. Conclusion: Our study indicated that the AaLS could be used as an antibody-binding nanoplatform to present nanobodies on its surface and improve the potency of nanobodies. The multivalent nanobody LS-B-B2 may serve as a potential agent for the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Single-Domain Antibodies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Epitopes , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral
2.
International journal of nanomedicine ; 18:353-367, 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2207788

ABSTRACT

Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variants have risen to dominance, which contains far more mutations in the spike protein in comparison to previously reported variants, compromising the efficacy of most existing vaccines or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Nanobody screened from high-throughput naïve libraries is a potential candidate for developing preventive and therapeutic antibodies. Methods Four nanobodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type receptor-binding domain (RBD) were screened from a naïve phage display library. Their affinity and neutralizing activity were evaluated by surface plasmon resonance assays, surrogate virus neutralization tests, and pseudovirus neutralization assays. Preliminary identification of the binding epitopes of nanobodies by peptide-based ELISA and competition assay. Then four multivalent nanobodies were engineered by attaching the monovalent nanobodies to an antibody-binding nanoplatform constructed based on the lumazine synthase protein cage nanoparticles isolated from the Aquifex aeolicus (AaLS). Finally, the differences in potency between the monovalent and multivalent nanobodies were compared using the same methods. Results Three of the four specific nanobodies could maintain substantial inhibitory activity against the Omicron (B.1.1.529), of them, B-B2 had the best neutralizing activity against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) pseudovirus (IC50 = 1.658 μg/mL). The antiviral ability of multivalent nanobody LS-B-B2 was improved in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) pseudovirus assays (IC50 = 0.653 μg/mL). The results of peptide-based ELISA indicated that LS-B-B2 might react with the linear epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD conserved regions, which would clarify the mechanisms for the maintenance of potent neutralization of Omicron (B.1.1.529) preliminary. Conclusion Our study indicated that the AaLS could be used as an antibody-binding nanoplatform to present nanobodies on its surface and improve the potency of nanobodies. The multivalent nanobody LS-B-B2 may serve as a potential agent for the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants.

3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 772511, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1556241

ABSTRACT

Recent exposure to seasonal coronaviruses (sCoVs) may stimulate cross-reactive antibody responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, previous studies have produced divergent results regarding protective or damaging immunity induced by prior sCoV exposure. It remains unknown whether pre-existing humoral immunity plays a role in vaccine-induced neutralization and antibody responses. In this study, we collected 36 paired sera samples from 36 healthy volunteers before and after immunization with inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for COVID-19, and analyzed the distribution and intensity of pre-existing antibody responses at the epitope level pre-vaccination as well as the relationship between pre-existing sCoV immunity and vaccine-induced neutralization. We observed large amounts of pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies in the conserved regions among sCoVs, especially the S2 subunit. Excep t for a few peptides, the IgG and IgM fluorescence intensities against S, M and N peptides did not differ significantly between pre-vaccination and post-vaccination sera of vaccinees who developed a neutralization inhibition rate (%inhibition) <40 and %inhibition ≥40 after two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants with strong and weak pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies (strong pre-CRA; weak pre-CRA) had similar %inhibition pre-vaccination (10.9% ± 2.9% vs. 12.0% ± 2.2%, P=0.990) and post-vaccination (43.8% ± 25.1% vs. 44.6% ± 21.5%, P=0.997). Overall, the strong pre-CRA group did not show a significantly greater increase in antibody responses to the S protein linear peptides post-vaccination compared with the weak pre-CRA group. Therefore, we found no evidence for a significant impact of pre-existing antibody responses on inactivated vaccine-induced neutralization and antibody responses. Our research provides an important basis for inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine use in the context of high sCoV seroprevalence.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Cross Reactions/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Coronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutralization Tests , Seasons , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
4.
J Biosaf Biosecur ; 4(1): 5-11, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1487854

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is as an emerging infectious disease (EID) that has caused the worst public health catastrophe of the 21st century thus far. In terms of impact, the COVID-19 pandemic is second only to the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 in modern world history. As of 7 September 2021, there have been 220 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and more than 4.5 million deaths. EIDs pose serious public health and socio-economic risks, and 70% of EIDs originate from wildlife. Preventing development of EIDs such as COVID-19 is a pressing concern. Here, taking the COVID-19 pandemic as an example, we illustrate the disastrous effects of EIDs and assess their emergence and evolution from a One Health perspective. We propose a One Health strategy, centered on 'moving the gates forward', for EID prevention and control at the human-animal-environment interface. This strategy may be instructive and provide early warnings of EIDs in the future.

6.
Commun Biol ; 4(1): 225, 2021 02 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1387490

ABSTRACT

Serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is impeded by immunological cross-reactivity among the human coronaviruses (HCoVs): SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, OC43, 229E, HKU1, and NL63. Here we report the identification of humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides that may enable discrimination between exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and other HCoVs. We used a high-density peptide microarray and plasma samples collected at two time points from 50 subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by qPCR, samples collected in 2004-2005 from 11 subjects with IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-1, 11 subjects with IgG antibodies to other seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoV), and 10 healthy human subjects. Through statistical modeling with linear regression and multidimensional scaling we identified specific peptides that were reassembled to identify 29 linear SARS-CoV-2 epitopes that were immunoreactive with plasma from individuals who had asymptomatic, mild or severe SARS-CoV-2 infections. Larger studies will be required to determine whether these peptides may be useful in serodiagnostics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Peptide Mapping , Peptides/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , COVID-19/blood , Chiroptera , Epitopes/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Peptides/chemistry , Proteome/metabolism
7.
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology ; n/a(n/a):e13088, 2021.
Article in English | Wiley | ID: covidwho-1263865

ABSTRACT

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered a global health emergency and brought disaster to humans. Tremendous efforts have been made to control the pandemic, among which neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are of specific interest to researchers. Neutralizing antibodies are generated within weeks after infection or immunization, and can protect cells from virus intrusion and confer protective immunity to cells. Thus, production of NAbs is considered as a main goal for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and NAbs may be used for patient treatment in the form of monoclonal antibodies. Neutralization assays are capable of quantitatively detecting NAbs against SARS-CoV-2, allowing to explore the relationship between the level of NAbs and the severity of the disease, and may predict the possibility of re-infection in COVID-19 patients. They can also be used to test the effects of monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma and vaccines. At present, wild-type virus neutralization assay remains the gold standard for measuring NAbs;while pseudovirus neutralization assays, Surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), and high-throughput versions of neutralization assays are popular alternatives with their own advantages and disadvantages. In this review article, we summarize the characteristics and recent progress of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays. Special attention is given to the current limitations of various neutralization assays so as to promote new possible strategies with NAbs by which rapid SARS-CoV-2 serological diagnosis and antiviral screening in the future will be achieved.

8.
Global Health ; 16(1): 79, 2020 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-750233

ABSTRACT

The Second International Symposium on One Health Research (ISOHR) was held in Guangzhou city, China on 23-24 November 2019. A transdisciplinary collaborative approach, One Health (OH), was the central theme of the symposium which brought together more than 260 experts, scholars and emerging researchers from human health, veterinary health, food safety, environmental health and related disciplines and sectors. More than 50 organizations including World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control (USA), and Queensland Government (Australia) participated in the symposium. Scholars, experts and emerging researchers, policy-makers and practitioners in their respective fields delivered over 50 presentations at the symposium, highlighting the collective vulnerability to some of the emerging health challenges the region was combating. These included emerging infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, climate change, food safety and the growing burden of non-communicable diseases. The Pearl River Declaration, emanated from the symposium, called for establishing a One Health Cooperation Network in the Southeast Asia-Pacific region with a vision to strengthen regional health security through sharing each other's knowledge and experience, and making investments in workforce development, scientific innovations such as vaccine research and development, sharing epidemic intelligence, risk identification, risk communication and appropriate response measures against emerging health threats.


Subject(s)
Global Health , One Health , World Health Organization , China , Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Epidemics , Government , Humans , International Cooperation , Organizations
9.
J Proteome Res ; 20(5): 2224-2239, 2021 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1118785

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has posed a serious threat to global public health. The mechanism of pathogenesis and the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection are largely unknown. In the present study, we applied a quantitative proteomic technology to identify and quantify the ubiquitination changes that occur in both the virus and the Vero E6 cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection. By applying label-free, quantitative liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry proteomics, 8943 lysine ubiquitination sites on 3086 proteins were identified, of which 138 sites on 104 proteins were quantified as significantly upregulated, while 828 sites on 447 proteins were downregulated at 72 h post-infection. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection might modulate host immune responses through the ubiquitination of important proteins, including USP5, IQGAP1, TRIM28, and Hsp90. Ubiquitination modification was also observed on 11 SAR-CoV-2 proteins, including proteins involved in virus replication and inhibition of the host innate immune response. Our study provides new insights into the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the host as well as potential targets for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Proteome , Humans , Proteome/genetics , Proteomics , SARS-CoV-2 , Ubiquitin
10.
Journal of Tropical Medicine ; 20(4):427-430, 2020.
Article in Chinese | GIM | ID: covidwho-1115749

ABSTRACT

Objective: The epidemic of Corona Virus disease 20l9 (COVID-l9) in Guangdong province during January 19, and February 7, 2020 was evaluated to provide evidence for the prevention and control of the COVID- l9 outbreak.

12.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 133(9): 1044-1050, 2020 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-3436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ongoing new coronavirus pneumonia (Corona Virus Disease 2019, COVID-19) outbreak is spreading in China, but it has not yet reached its peak. Five million people emigrated from Wuhan before lockdown, potentially representing a source of virus infection. Determining case distribution and its correlation with population emigration from Wuhan in the early stage of the epidemic is of great importance for early warning and for the prevention of future outbreaks. METHODS: The official case report on the COVID-19 epidemic was collected as of January 30, 2020. Time and location information on COVID-19 cases was extracted and analyzed using ArcGIS and WinBUGS software. Data on population migration from Wuhan city and Hubei province were extracted from Baidu Qianxi, and their correlation with the number of cases was analyzed. RESULTS: The COVID-19 confirmed and death cases in Hubei province accounted for 59.91% (5806/9692) and 95.77% (204/213) of the total cases in China, respectively. Hot spot provinces included Sichuan and Yunnan, which are adjacent to Hubei. The time risk of Hubei province on the following day was 1.960 times that on the previous day. The number of cases in some cities was relatively low, but the time risk appeared to be continuously rising. The correlation coefficient between the provincial number of cases and emigration from Wuhan was up to 0.943. The lockdown of 17 cities in Hubei province and the implementation of nationwide control measures efficiently prevented an exponential growth in the number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The population that emigrated from Wuhan was the main infection source in other cities and provinces. Some cities with a low number of cases showed a rapid increase in case load. Owing to the upcoming Spring Festival return wave, understanding the risk trends in different regions is crucial to ensure preparedness at both the individual and organization levels and to prevent new outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Emigration and Immigration , Epidemics , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL